Aqil Teguh Fathani, Roni Ekha Putera, Nabila Mohamed


Abstrack : The aims of study is to investigate phenomenon of bureaucratic inertia within the Indonesian government system, which detrimentally affects government governance, administrative systems, and public services provided to the people. It is crucial to acknowledge the significant risk posed by the persistence of bureaucratic inertia in the absence of any proactive measures to address and advance necessary changes. This research employs a comprehensive literature review, incorporating 35 relevant scholarly sources that are closely aligned with the current study. The occurrence of bureaucratic inertia in Indonesia is a significant challenge since local institutions always face pressure from the central government, resulting in diminished authority, influence, and power. From an institutional standpoint, it is crucial to have transparency mechanisms in place to guide decision-makers. These mechanisms should allow for the authorization or restriction of actions, enforceable regulations and procedures, and appropriate incentives or penalties to ensure wise decision-making. By implementing such measures, institutions can gradually develop into responsible entities that prioritize transparency in meeting public demands. From a capacity standpoint, the key criteria for overcoming bureaucratic inertia include improving the organizational and managerial structure, facilities, and infrastructure, and promoting the establishment of an extensive network. Furthermore, there exists a significant prospect to engage in cooperation with exterior stakeholders to leverage solutions to compete with regions that possess greater advancement than others.
Keywords : government; governance; bureaucratic inertia; government management; decentralization; Indonesia.


Government Management; Governance; Bureaucratic Inertia; Decentralization; Indonesia

Full Text:



Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective Action, Property Rights, and Decentralization in Resource Use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29(4), 485–514.

Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. J. (2011). E-government principles: implementation, advantages and challenges. International Journal of Electronic Business, 9(3), 255.

Anantasari, E., Daly, M., Glassey, P., Grace, E., Coomer, M., & Woods, R. (2017). Disaster risk reduction (DRR) Capacity and Capability of Local Government in Indonesia (pp. 127–155). Springer, Cham.

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

Apospori, E., Avlonitis, G., & Zisouli, M. (2010). Political culture and perception of political marketing tools: A cross-generational comparison. Journal of Political Marketing, 9(1–2), 111–134.

Atkinson, C. L. (2021). Theme-based Book Review: Government Capacity and Capability Theme-based Book Review: Government Capacity and Capability. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(6), 530–535.

Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social Identity, Distinctiveness, and In-Group Homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11(1), 150–164.

Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2004). The Australian Policy Handbook. Allen & Unwin.

Bunnell, T., Miller, M. A., Phelps, N. A., & Taylor, J. (2013). Urban development in a decentralized Indonesia: Two Success Stories? Pacific Affairs, 86(4), 857–876.

Diprose, R. (2009). Decentralization, Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict Management in Indonesia. Ethnopolitics, 8(1), 107–134.

Douglas, N., & Anastasia, A. (2007). Evaluating Capacity Development. International Service for National Agriculture Research.

Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009). ‘Urban Ecological Security’: A New Urban Paradigm? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 193–215.

Jailani, M., Dewantara, J. A., & Rahmani, E. F. (2023). The awareness of mutual respect post-conflicts: ethnic chinese strategy through social interaction and engagement in West Kalimantan. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 33(1), 17–34.

Junaid, I. (2021). Models of Community Capacity Building for Homestay Management. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 247–258.

Kusumasari, B., Alam, Q., & Siddiqui, K. (2010). Resource capability for local government in managing disaster. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 438–451.

Lestari, L., Fathani, A. T., & Damin, Z. A. (2023). Preparation for Indonesian Election 2024: Women’s Participation in Political Contest. Journal of Governance, 8(2).

Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Rozema, J. G., & Frye‐Levine, L. A. (2014). Institutional inertia and climate change: a review of the new institutionalist literature. WIREs Climate Change, 5(5), 639–648.

Nas, J., Nurlinah, & Haryanto. (2019). Indigenous Village Governance: Lessons from Indonesia. Public Administration Issues, 6, 94–104.

Nelisson, N. (2002). The Administrative Capacity of New Types of Governance. Public Organization Review, 2, 5–22.

Offe, C. (1998). “Homogeneity” and Constitutional Democracy: Coping with Identity Conflicts through Group Rights. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(2), 113–141.

Ostrom, E. (2001). Vulnerability and Polycentric Governance Systems Elinor. In Newsletter of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.

Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press.

Purnomo, E. P., Ramdani, R., Agustiyara, Nurmandi, A., Trisnawati, D. W., & Fathani, A. T. (2021). Bureaucratic inertia in dealing with annual forest fires in Indonesia. International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Purnomo, E. P., Zahra, A. A., & Malawani, A. D. (2021). The Kalimantan Forest Fires : An Actor Analysis Based on Supreme Court Documents in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 1–12.

Scholta, H., Mertens, W., Kowalkiewicz, M., & Becker, J. (2019). From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 11–26.

Sellers, J. M., Lidström, A., & Bae, Y. (2020). Multilevel Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Simon, B., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1990). Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 269–286.

Simons, G. (2020). Policy and Political Marketing: Promoting Conflict as Policy. Journal of Political Marketing, 0(0), 1–28.

Sundari, C., Purnomo, E. P., & Fathani, A. T. (2022). Civil Society Participation Model: Forest and Land Fire Prevention Policy in Jambi Province. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), 12(4), 669–678.

Talitha, T., Firman, T., & Hudalah, D. (2019). Welcoming two decades of decentralization in Indonesia: a regional development perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 0(0), 1–19.

Tommasi, M., & Weinschelbaum, F. (2007). Centralization vs. Decentralization: A Principal-Agent Analysis. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(2), 369–389.

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11.

Torfing, J., & Ansell, C. (2017). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review, 19(1), 37–54.

Wallis, J., & Dollery, B. (2002). Social Capital and Local Government Capacity. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 76–85.

Watts, J. D. (2020). Community living standards and rural household decision making. Journal of Rural Studies, 80, 23–33.



Flag Counter

Web Analytics

View JTP Statistic



Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Riau Kepulauan

unit E

Jl. Pahlawan No. 99, Bukit Tempayan, Batu Aji, Kota Batam

Contact: (0778) 39275




In Cooperation with:                     Powered By: 




Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal Trias Politika (JTP) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.